Apostoli, Peter & Brown, Bryson

— 1995, A solution to the completeness problem for weakly aggregative modal logic, *Journal of Symbolic Logic,* 60, 832–842.

Auman, Robert J.

— 1976, Agreeing to disagree, *The Annals of Statistics,* 4, 1236–1239.

Beall, J. C. & Restall, Greg

— 2001, Defending logical pluralism, *in* J. Woods and B. Brown (eds.), *Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches,* Oxford: Hermes Science, 1–22.

— 2006, *Logical Pluralism,* New York: Oxford University Press.

Brown, Bryson

— 2002, Approximate truth: a paraconsistent account, in Joke Meheus (ed.), *Inconsistency in Science,* Dordrecht: Kluwer, 81–103.

Carnap, Rudolf

— 1937, *The Logical Syntax of Language,* London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co. (originally published in 1934).

Dummett, Michael

— 1978, *Truth and Other Enigmas,* Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Field, Hartry

— 2009, Pluralism in logic, *The Review of Symbolic Logic,* 2 (2), June, 342–359.

Follesdal, Dagfinn

— 2004, *Referential Opacity and Modal Logic,* London: Taylor and Francis (first published in 1966).

Gabbay, Dov M.

— 1994, What is a logical system?, *in* Dov M. Gabbay (ed.), *What is a Logical System?*, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 179–216.

Grattan-Guinness, Ivor

— 1998, Are other logics possible? MacColl’s logic and some English reactions, 1905-1912, *Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic,* 3 (1), 1–16.

Haack, Susan

— 1978, *Philosophy of Logics,* Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hacking, Ian

— 1979, What is logic?, *Journal of Philosophy,* 76, 285–319.

Harman, Gilbert

— 1972, Is modal logic logic?, *Philosophia,* 2, 75–84.

— 1986, *Change in View,* Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hughes George E. & Cresswell, Max

— 1968, *An Introduction to Modal Logic,* London: Methuen.

— 1996, *A New Introduction to Modal Logic,* London: Routledge.

Kant, Immanuel

— 1974a, *Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of Principles of Natural Philosophy and Morality, and Logic,* Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill (originally published in 1764).

— 1974b, *Logic,* translated and with an introduction by Robert S. Hartman and Wolfgang Schwartz, Indianapolis—New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1974 (originally published in 1800).

Locke, John

— 1961, *An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,* edited by John W. Yolton, 2 vols., London: Dent (originally published in 1690).

MacColl, Hugh

— 1880, Symbolical reasoning, *Mind,* 5 (17), 45–60.

— 1906, *Symbolic Logic and Its Applications,* London: Longmans, Green, & Co.

— 1908, ‘If’ and ‘imply’, *Mind,* n. s., 17 (65), 151–152.

Machery, Eduard

— 2009, *Doing without Concepts,* New York: Oxford University Press.

Margolis, Eric & Laurence, Stephen (eds)

— 1996, *Concepts: Core Readings,* Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Paglieri, Fabio & Woods, John

— 2009, Enthymematic parsimony, *Synthese,* SpringerLink date: 12 August, DOI: 10.1007/s11229-009-9652-3.

Peacocke, Christopher

— 1976, What is a logical constant?, *Journal of Philosophy,* 72, 221–240.

Poincaré, Henri

— 1905, *Science and Hypothesis,* London: Walter Scott.

Priest, Graham

— 2001, Logic: One or many?, *in* J. Woods and B. Brown (eds.), *Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches,* Oxford: Hermes Science, 23–38.

Putnam, Hilary

— 1968, Is logic empirical?, *in* R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky (eds.), *Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science,* 5, Dordrecht: Reidel, 216–241.

Quine, Willard Van Orman

— 1970, *Philosophy of Logic,* Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

— 1992, *Pursuit of Truth,* Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rahman, Shahid & Redmond, Juan

— 2008, Hugh MacColl and the birth of logical pluralism, in Dov M. Gabbay & John Woods (eds.), *British Logic in the Nineteenth Century,* vol. 4 of the *Handbook of the History of Logic,* Amsterdam: North-Holland, 533–604.

Russell, Bertrand

— 1903, *The Principles of Mathematics,* Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2^{nd} ed., 1937).

Scriven, Michael

— 1976, *Reasoning,* New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sher, Gila

— 2001, Is logic a theory of the obvious?, *in* J. Woods and B. Brown (eds.), *Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches,* Oxford: Hermes Science, 55–79.

Stove, David

— 1996, Cole Porter and Karl Popper: The Jazz age in the philosophy of science, *in* Roger Kimball (ed.), *Against the Idols of the Age: David Stove,* New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 3–32.

Tarski, Alfred

— 1956, On the concept of logical consequence, *in* A. Tarski, *Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics,* trans. by J. H. Woodger, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 409–420.

Van Benthem, Johan

— 1979, What is dialectical logic?, *Erkenntnis,* 14 (3), 333–347.

Woods, John

— 1968, *Inference and Implication,* Toronto: University of Toronto (mimeo).

— 1989, The relevance of relevant logic, *in* Jean Norman & Richard Sylvan (eds.), *Directions in Relevant Logic,* Dordrecht: Kluwer, 77-86

— 2001, Pluralism about logical consequence: resolving conflict in logical theory, *in* J. Woods and B. Brown (eds.), *Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches,* Oxford: Hermes Science, 39–54.

— 2003, *Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences,* Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Woods, John & Brown, Bryson (eds.)

— 2001, *Logical Consequence: Rival Approaches. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Society for Exact Philosophy,* Oxford: Hermes Science.

Woods, John & Walton, Douglas

— 1972, On fallacies, *Journal of Critical Analysis,* 5, 103–111 (reprinted as chapter 1 of their *Fallacies: Selected Papers 1972-1982,* Dordrecht: Foris, 1989; 2^{nd} ed., with a Forward by Dale Jacquette, London: College Publications, 2007).